UK General Election 2017: Why is ‘economy’ being the elephant in the room?

#Brexit Facts

2017 UK General Election was all about Brexit, which is expected to be a long, painful and unprecedented process. Obviously, before making up their opinions, voters needed some clarity on how the parties planned to handle the Brexit-related issues.

Public debate in the UK General Election campaign was overwhelmingly dominated by issues like health & social spending on the elderly, nuclear weaponsterrorism, policing security.

Have you noticed that there was a huge omission from the election debate and journalists let both parties get away with that? Yes, it is about Economics! Economy featured very little in the campaign of both major parties with no comprehensive debate on how they would  handle the heavy economic consequences of Brexit. Actually, they did not even bother to give an estimated cost of Brexit under the “hard Brexit” scenario which happens to be the favourite option of both Labour and the Tories (so that the UK can take the control of its borders back).

The UK economy is already showing serious signs of weaknesses mostly driven by the uncertainty surrounding the future EU-UK relationship. Let’s have a quick look to the UK economy as it stands in the first half of 2017:

  • Since the Brexit vote, the British Pound has been depreciating dramatically (about 18%), however exports growth remained disappointingly weakaggravating the negative contribution of external trade to GDP.
  • Inflation stands well above the target of 2% and the Bank of England expects it to remain close to 3% throughout the year.
  • High inflation is eroding the purchasing power of consumers and real earnings are declining further every quarter.
  • The UK public debt is at historically high levels and lower growth prospects coupled with uncertainty surrounding Brexit negotiations is likely to reduce investors’ appetite to hold UK debt, also in the medium-term.

Against this background, I will pick only 3 issues from a long list of issues to be discussed in the 2017 UK General Election campaign:

  • Pound depreciation does not seem to naturally support the exporting sector. The UK manufacturing sector is extremely small, accounting for less than 10 % of total labour force. Moreover, it is highly inefficient with lower productivity than Italy’s. What kind of policies have the leaders in mind to enhance the exporting sector after leaving the EU?
  • Leaving the EU means leaving the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). So far, the UK farmers have heavily relied on CAP subsidies, which are worth about £3.5bn a year, making up about 55% of farmers’ incomes. How would the farming sector survive without the EU funds? Would there be a new UK fund allocated to farming?
  • UK public debt is already at historically high levels. Brexit will result in a dramatic decline of tax revenues as a consequence of following developments: Lower economic growth, high inflation, loss of financial passporting rights for the EU, lower demand for services, the relocation of financial activities and the qualified migrants to the Continent, etc. How will the new government cope with declining public revenues without increasing taxes (as higher taxes would further drag the economy down)?

Whoever wins the election, (s)he had to deal with these issues immediately. Then, why was ‘economy’ the elephant in the room during the entire campaign? Did both Labour and Conservative parties even have a plan to deal with these key economic challenges coming with Brexit?

How many Brexiteers do still believe that there is a ‘cake’ and they will truly eat it soon? Sadly, post-truth politics thrived in the General Election and history repeated itself in less than a year. In the name of democracy, UK voters were asked to make a crucial choice for future generations without having any clarity on what they are signing for.